

Añadido: 04/09/2008
LEARN MORE ABOUT THE DODGE CHALLENGER SRT8: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=125459 The 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 is a muscle car, right? An American muscle car. So naturally, the first thing I want to do when I jump behind the wheel is a big American smoky burnout. "Not here," says Pete Gladysz, the Dodge guy babysitting our test car and riding shotgun, as he looks around the leafy, tranquil residential street we're on in the middle of Pasadena. "Wait 'till we get to the track." Gladysz, powertrain senior manager for Chrysler LLC's SRT Group, sounds serious. So I wait.
Etiquetas: Dodge Challenger SRT-8 Edmunds Inside Line muscle car auto motor race racing American
DaveKernen (28/08/2010)
@mikemaj82
It's not.
DaveKernen (28/08/2010)
@CRNKWLKD
You also have half the car in everything else that matters.... interior room, cargo space, looks, testosterone, etc. Now that's sad. A cute little Honda with no balls that wants to be a muscle car. LMAO
RJL1981 (28/08/2010)
@AudiABTr8 the mopar fans that have been waiting 35 years for their pony car and it gets beat by the ss and gt in every way. So is the challenger rare, yes. More expensive, heavier, slower, gets worse fuel economy, Yes. Nearly as good as the Mustang, only if comparing it to a $20k Corolla S.
inocente106 (28/08/2010)
6.1L !!!! wow !!!
danny51981 (26/08/2010)
@AudiABTr8 where I live Its rare NOT to see a mustang or a challenger... same deal same shitty interiors and people are getting brake jobs after 6 months of purchasing them brand new... imports FTW
2010CamaroSC (25/08/2010)
@starksy17 motortrend has clocked 0-60 in 4.7 seconds. and yeah the GT500 is also supercharged...
cubano1389 (25/08/2010)
@CRNKWLKD Ur car also is less heavy by a lot , i think the challenger is close to 4-4.3k pounds, HP/Weight ratio remember, i could have a 10kpound car with 700 hp but its 10k pounds lol meanwhile a civic with 150hp that weights 2000pounds will eat it alive.
rammstein67350 (25/08/2010)
@disbsam333 And when did i say that french cars are good cars ?
rammstein67350 (25/08/2010)
@cubano1389 My mother is french and my dad is german, so fuck of
JellyBird12 (25/08/2010)
The Better numbers that have ben tested, for all you people who dont know..
Torque
420lb ft
Weight
4,136lbs
0-60mph
4.6s
0-100kmh/0-62mph
4.8s
0-100mph/0-160kmh
10.7s
0-124mph/0-200kmh
17.2s
0-100-0
16.2 seconds
1/4 Mile
12.8 At 110mph
60-0
110ft
Drag
Cd.35
Top Speed
176.3mph
Virginia International Raceway 3:16.3, Faster than a Lotus Elise SuperCharged, may have double the power, but it has double the weight too.
There ya go. Buy it.
JellyBird12 (25/08/2010)
@starksy17 Actually 4.6s for the SRT is the best, and even with that, it would still get ate up by the 08 GT500, 4.3s.
disbsam333 (25/08/2010)
@rammstein67350 And what kind of quality does France put into their cars? Peugeot? Citroen??? What a joke, and don't name your little niche brands like Bugatti, that doesn't count, its German. Challengers are nothing but nice. You just wish your country had wide enough roads to fit these land beasts.
cubano1389 (25/08/2010)
@rammstein67350 u are french wtf do u know about a cars quality, faggot.
iguana8334 (24/08/2010)
@rammstein67350 go sit in a challenger srt8, or even the R/T. They are fantastic inside. No plastic dash, not a rattle box. The new camaro on the other hand is classic plastic rattle box.
rammstein67350 (23/08/2010)
@starksy17 quality ? american cars are all but quality
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@conjurer968 nahh not a peice of shit, im a ford fan, but the challenger is a great looking, qualtiy car, they didnt really make it for the numbers, just looks, sounds, and well, thats about all i can give ya XD
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@2010CamaroSC not 4.7 4.8 at BEST , this is in the Shelby GT500 class, which is 0-60 in 3.9 for the 2011
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@undeadkillers Yes, I understand, but ud think dodge would do more to make this beast move, I love the looks, but the numbers are sad, this is in the class of the Shelby Gt500 yet has trouble agianst the v6 mustang? not very good numbers there
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@luckafrei117 Im not gunna lie, its a beautiful car, But needs to be either more refined, or shed of weight, because v6 mustangs are its closest competor, and the srt8 technically is supposed to go against, the shelby gt500, the R/T is for the GT and SS, and obviously the pathetic SE is for the other v6 cars, My grampa's Taurus SEL is faster 0-60 and 1/4 mile XD
x0Spectator0x (23/08/2010)
@starksy17 Yup.. N no im not
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@x0Spectator0x are you sayin the fastest numbers for the challenger is that?? Cuz, those are pushin it :P for a challenger at least
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@CRNKWLKD the challenger is way over wieghted, ALOT lol
starksy17 (23/08/2010)
@ObaMasEviLTwiN he counted wrong then
ObaMasEviLTwiN (22/08/2010)
@x0Spectator0x yea my dad has one and hes gotten to 60 in like 4 and a half seconds
CRNKWLKD (22/08/2010)
damn my stock S2k is only .1sec slower than this in the 1/4mile and I have less than half the hp...sad!!